Research at Stern Cardiovascular

Why we Conduct Clinical Trials

Cardiovascular disease is by far the most important health problem in the United States. Participation in clinical trials not only helps the development of new medicines and devices for the community as a whole but also helps the individual patient participating in each trial. This is only one reason that, at Stern Cardiovascular, participation in clinical trials is valued.

Our Current Clinical Trials

Aortic Regurgitation

Paradigm: Patients with Paravalvular Leak (PVL) using the the Amplatzer Valvular Plug via Interventional Transcatheter Closure

A Prospective, Multicenter, Single Arm Study to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the AVP III as a treatment for clinically significant PVLs following surgical implant of a mechanical or biological heart valve implanted in the aortic or mitral position.

Atrial Fibrillation

DEFINE AFIB: Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and a LINQ implantable device

Prospective, Observational, Non-Significant risk post-market clinical study utilizing Medtronic Discovery App.

Cardiomyopathy: Dilated (DCM), Hypertrophic (HCM), Restrictive (RCM)

ARRAY 797-301: Patients with Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM) with Lamin A/C Gene Mutation

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) due to a mutation of the gene encoding the lamin A/C protein (LMNA)

MYK 491-006: Study of Danicamtiv in Patients with Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM) with MYH7 or TTN Gene Variants

An Open-Label, Exploratory Study of the Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of Danicamtiv in Stable Ambulatory Patients With Primary Dilated Cardiomyopathy Due to Either MYH7 or TTN Variants

Carotid Artery Disease

PERFORMANCE II: Patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis at high risk for operative Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA)

A Prospective, Multicenter Single-Arm, Open Label study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Neuroguard IEP System for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis in subjects at elevated risk for adverse events following carotid endarterectomy (CEA).

Congestive Heart Failure

ALLEVIATE HF: Algorithm using Implantable LINQ sensors for Evaluation and Treatment of patients with Heart Failure

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Blinded, Multi-Site, Interventional, Investigational device exemption (IDE) pivotal study

ASTRAAS HF: Study of IONIS-AGT-LRx Subcutaneously in patients with Heart Failure and a EF ≤ 40%

A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study Assessing the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of IONIS-AGT-LRx, an Antisense Inhibitor of Angiotensinogen Production, Administered Subcutaneously Over 12 Weeks in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

FINEARTS: Study to Assess Finerenone in patients with Heart Failure and an Ejection Fraction ≥40%

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Finerenone on Morbidity and Mortality in Participants With Heart Failure (NYHA II-IV) and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ≥ 40% (LVEF ≥ 40%)

MYK 461-019 EMBARK: Study of Mavacamten in patients ≥ 50 yrs old with Heart Failure, EF ≥ 60% and Elevated NT proBNP

An Exploratory, Open-label, Proof-of-concept, Phase 2a Study of Mavacamten (MYK-461) in Participants With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) and Chronic Elevation of Cardiac Biomarkers

PARAGLIDE: Sacubitril + Valsartan vs Valsartan alone in Patients with Heart Failure and an EF > 40% and recent Heart Failure Hospitalization

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel Group, Active Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696) Versus Valsartan on Changes in NT-proBNP, Safety, and Tolerability in HFpEF Patients With a WHF Event (HFpEF Decompensation) Who Have Been Stabilized and Initiated at the Time of or Within 30 Days Post-decompensation.

RELIEVE HF: Patients with NYHA Class II-IV Heart Failure and the V-Wave Interarterial Shunt System to Reduce Lung Congestion

A Prospective, Multi-Center, 1:1 Randomized, patient and observer blinded clinical study, with a Shunt Treatment arm and a non-implant Control arm.

SOLVE-CRT: Patients with NYHA Class II, III, IV Heart Failure with an EF ≤ 35% that are considered previously untreatable or are at high risk for upgrade

This Study is a Prospective, Multi-Center, Pivotal Trial to study the safety and efficacy of the WiSE-CRT System for Cardiac Re-synchronization Therapy.

SPIRRIT: Spironolactone vs Standard of Care in Patients ≥ 50 yrs old with stable Heart Failure and an EF ≥ 40%, NYHA Class II-IV, and elevated NT-proBNP

A 1:1 Randomized, Interventional, Multicenter, Safety/Efficacy, Parallel assignment, open-label treatment study.

SUMMIT: Tirzepatide in patients with Heart Failure and an EF ≥ 50%, NYHA Class II-IV, elevated NT-proBNP, and BMI ≥ 30kg/m²

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Tirzepatide Versus Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Obesity.

Fabry Disease

CHIESI: Expanded access Treatment of Pegunigalsidase Alfa in Patients with Fabry Disease

The objective of this treatment protocol is to provide guidance to Treating Physicians who seek access to pegunigalsidase alfa for Fabry patients whose clinical condition, in the opinion of the Treating Physician, requires treatment with enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with pegunigalsidase alfa and a) cannot be adequately treated with currently approved FDA products and/or b) are not able or willing to participate in any of the on-going clinical trials in the United States.

Why Should I Participate in Medical Research Study?

For many years, medical advances were made merely by physician investigators reporting their experience with different therapies. This was reasonably successful in a time where the scientific method was difficult to apply because so many of the medical sciences were so inexact and basic science theories about the true mechanisms of disease were unavailable. In the modern era, it has become apparent that for most therapies to have proven efficacies they need to be studied in well-designed clinical trials. These trials usually involve comparing a new medicine or procedure to existing therapy. Often, when medicines are involved, these trials involve the use of an inactive pill, or placebo, to be given to part of the patients in a clinical trial. This is necessary because many patients will benefit psychologically from any medicine and will have improved clinical result, which may mask the true benefit, or harm the new medicine being studied. This has been well shown in numerous cardiology studies over the last 10 years where different types of heart medicines to treat congestive heart failure and heart rhythm irregularities were shown to be actually harmful. In these trials, patients receiving the placebo actually faired better than those receiving the investigational medicines. Because of these observations, the Food and Drug Administration, prior to approving new medicines for use in the general medical community, almost always requires these trials where a new medicine is compared to a placebo.

These are the only ways to truly test the efficacy and safety of new medications. For example, many trials show that patients in the placebo group will often have side effects equal to those receiving the active medication. This is particularly common for "nuisance" side effects such as insomnia, headache, mild gastrointestinal upset, etc.

Patients with serious diseases almost always benefit from participating in these well-designed clinical trials for numerous reasons. In general, if the patient participates in the trial it is because he/she has a condition for which better therapies are needed and conventional therapies are not totally satisfactory. As a general rule, the physicians participating in these trials are those with extensive knowledge in that specific disease state as proven by their selection to run these trials. Patients in these trials are carefully followed by the clinical team of the research center and receive extra care and lab work, which will enhance their care during the conduct of a trial. Many studies have shown that patients receiving even the placebo in the clinical trial fair better than their counterparts receiving standard care within the community.

Our clinical trials have focused on several areas within cardiovascular disease. Our largest experience in treating patients with heart muscle weakness often manifests as congestive heart failure. Many patients with this disease will have a mortality rate each year in excess of 10% when receiving conventional therapy. We have several ongoing trials looking at new medications which are added to conventional therapy in hopes of reducing complications due to progressive heart muscle weakness, cardiac rhythm irregularities, and other consequences of congestive heart failure. These involve medications that block excessive spasm of the arteries within the body, block excessive inflammatory response, and drugs and implantable devices that block catastrophic unpredictable heart rhythm irregularities.

Heart muscle weakness is such a serious disease that most patients will benefit from being in these clinical trials. Another area of research involves patients with heart attacks treated with emergency use of balloons (angioplasty) or intravenously administered enzymes known as "clot busters". Although these are relatively successful state of the art therapies, they still leave some patients with extensive heart muscle damage. We are investigating the use of several additional treatments such as hormonal infusions during the acute phase of heart attacks as well as antibodies which block and excessive white blood cell inflammation of the area of heart attack.